Posted on Oct 27, 2009 08:59:58 AM | Dan Kanigan | 5 Comments
-
The skies look clear except for some high clouds, there’s no rain in the immediate forecast, so why might a rocket not launch? The answer is something called triboelectrification. While this isn’t a word you encounter every day, you might experience it if you walk across a dry carpet or brush up against a cat and then touch a metal surface: it’s static.
In the case of Ares I-X, flying through high-level clouds can generate “P-static” (P for precipitation), which can create a corona of static around the rocket that interferes with radio signals sent by or to the rocket. This would create problems when the rocket tries to transmit data down to the ground or if the Range Safety Officer at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station needed to send a signal to the flight termination system. Until the 45th Space Wing and observer aircraft indicate that the skies are clear, Ares I-X will wait them out.
Tags : General
5 comments so far ( Post your own )
- 5
On Oct 28, 2009 09:46:57 AM
Debbie
wrote:
Could the static be discharged by a separate smaller rocket launched right before the Ares I-X is launched, or is the static too high in the atmosphere to be dissipated by a smaller rocket?
- 4 On Oct 28, 2009 11:09:02 AM guest wrote:
It's good to see NASA setting strict rules for themselves and adhering to those rules. It's these sort of rules that minimize external events affecting probability of launch success. Launch success isn't whether or not the vehicle gets off the pad, but whether the vehicle goes out of control and has to be detonated or not.
By making sure the conditions are a good as possible for Launch increases the success probability of the Launch. I can't imagine some of the frustration Launch Control must have, but it shows that in the face of any frustration they have the resolve to adhere to the rules.
I can't believe NASA doesn't get the money it needs!- 3 On Oct 27, 2009 10:12:23 AM guest wrote:
Why wouldn't this be taken into consideration as it was in the shuttle?
- 2 On Oct 27, 2009 01:39:43 PM Rick wrote:
I followed this all morning, cursing the captain who was unable to keep his freighter out of the range. I find myself applauding Weather's fortitude to make the Right Call even when there has to be intense political, financial and boss-created pressure to allow the launch. Not the job I'd want at the Cape.
I'll miss tomorrow's launch if it goes on schedule, as it's currently set for "way too early PST". If it gets delays I'll follow it live.
And if another "freighter" ends up in the range again, or any "fishing trawlers", maybe it's time to test the accuracy of the launch system :P- 1 On Oct 27, 2009 03:23:59 PM guest wrote:
why is there a "short" 4 hour launch window for a suborbital flight? is it just about having the vehicle in a hold situation for too long? roadblocking the seashipping lanes too long?
- 4 On Oct 28, 2009 11:09:02 AM guest wrote:
Comment notes
Keep comments relevant. Inappropriate or offensive comments may be edited and/or deleted. Avoid adding Web site urls.
Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use
<p>or<br/>. Quotes, apostrophes, and double-dashes are automatically converted to smart punctuation. Be careful when copying and pasting portions of entries or other comments.