Partnerships in Space

Last week Goddard Space Flight Center was treated to a visit from Joe Klimavicz, the CIO of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and 25 people from his office.  I must admit, that I’ve always had a soft spot for NOAA.  That’s where I had my first job as a civil servant – as GS-2 Student Assistant Cartographer.  That’s also where, after ruining another nautical chart, wiser veterans pried a pen out of my ink-stained left hand and banished me permanently into the purgatory called Information Technology. NOAA CIO Joe Klimavicz

 

Bobby German, Acting CIO of NASA, and I gave a brief overview of the IT challenges at NASA. Joe with concurrence from his crew remarked that he could have given the same overview – except instead of saying NASA or Goddard, he would say NOAA.  Remarkable? Not really.  As I type this, I am on my way to the Department of Energy (DOE) CIO Conference.  Sadly, because of weather delays, I missed the opening remarks from CIO, Tom Pyke.  But after doing a gig myself at DOE, I know that he could have given the same overview that Bobby and I gave – except instead of saying NASA or Goddard or NOAA, he’d said DOE. 

 

So, I wonder, in the words of Rodney King, “why can’t we all just get along?”  In other words, ineffective IT governance is the Garden of Eden for almost all of the IT problems that we have – How we make decisions? Who makes decisions? How we inform those decisions? Seems like an easy thing to figure out, right? But I suppose if it were easy, we would have already done it.  It also seems point to another Garden of Eden conundrum and boil down to individual accountability and that free will thing again.  Sure we need policy to tell us what is right and wrong, but policy won’t protect us from individuals who, whether from ignorance or defiance, make the wrong choices from a security perspective.  But, we do we continue to struggle as a collective don’t we????

 

As I muddle through this blog, I’m sitting next to Bob Carter, VP of Federal Sales from a company that sells security technology to government.   Like me, he was on his way to the DOE CIO Conference.  I told him what I was blogging about and asked his opinion after cautioning him to please not try to sell me anything. While he assured me that technology was a necessary component of the solution he cautions that throwing a bunch of technology at it wasn’t the answer either. I chuckled to myself ironically wondering if his assertion will still provide them a viable sales pipeline – but mercifully he was candid, a cool dude and a straight shooter.

 

Who knows, but we need to be able to pull together and figure it all out.  And if as Bob suggests, technology is the first line of defense, maybe we need to also look at people – partnerships and individual accountability … and processes – governance and risk-based strategies. 

 

That’s why I was excited about meeting with NOAA and why I was excited about the DOE CIO Conference.  Maybe we can work together where all of us are smarter than each of us.  Perhaps collectively, we can find a way for IT to help our respective missions better serve this country … even this planet.

2 thoughts on “Partnerships in Space”

  1. It seems as though some of the CIO’s in Federal Agentcies, including yourself, have transended into and beyond, what is needed for the development of this ever growing age of information technology. It is just a shame that others who hold positions in some of the offices of the government can’t seem to get a grasp on the idea’s that are needed to collectively move this nation and world in the right direction.
    RT.

  2. Excellent point. I used to believe (when I was in government, and worked for one agency) that multiple agencies could/should band together collectively around shared missions to share decisions and approaches on policy, technology, security, etc. In other words, NASA and DOE and NOAA, maybe NRO. In my old world, it would have been DIA, CIA, NSA, etc…. and we frequently did do work like that collectively, with some small advances.

    Now that I am outside government and able to ponder a bit more, I think it might be more beneficial to erase the “functional alignment” requirement, and just go hog-wild in collaboration across government. The tools and approaches are becoming way too horizontal and powerful – and too ubiquitous – to respect the old lines. IT people in one realm learn from those in another; mission people similarly; and everyone is immersed in an information-dense environment anyway, why not let a thousand flowers bloom and see what happens.

    I enjoy reading your blog! -lewis

Comments are closed.