(Written July 1, 2008)
Two FBI agents appeared at my small inner office door at NASA Headquarters and flashed their badges. It was 1984. They asked to see my financial files on the Space Telescope. Congress had initiated an investigation of NASA’s financial records on the Great Observatory. As the twenty-eight year-old Space Telescope financial analyst, this shocking visit was not the welcome I had wished for from Washington. Yet this event, great in my young life, was miniscule compared to the journey that we who worked on Hubble would be taking.
Fast-forward twenty-four years to today at the Goddard Space Flight Center. The Hubble Space Telescope has had eighteen incredibly successful years of science. Hubble pictures of our Universe are in textbooks and on dorm walls all across the world. Hubble is the first and only space telescope that has become an American icon. As Matt Mountain, Director of the Space Telescope Science Institute, proudly stated today, Hubble is now producing twelve scientific discoveries a week! However, it may be that Hubble is so loved by Americans because it was almost the ugly duckling story in reverse. The faulty mirror was corrected with additional optics–optics that could only have been placed inside the orbiting Hubble by astronauts.
Now, after four repair missions successfully upgraded the observatory over the years, Hubble will be repaired one last time, but what a doozie this last time will be!
Of course, as with all things Hubble, there has to be some drama, and the story of Servicing Mission 4 is no exception. It was a seemingly never-ending series of on-again, off-again, flip-flops.
This final repair mission was originally approved for 2002. Then in February 2003, we had the Columbia disaster. In April 2004, then NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe canceled the repair mission due to Shuttle safety considerations. After intense public pressure, O’Keefe approved the study of an alternative approach using an autonomous robotic mission. Although autonomous repair will one day be common to spacecraft designed from the get-go for robotic upkeep, Hubble had no such birthright. Hubble’s robotic repair was clearly possible, but it would certainly be expensive. Initial cost estimates put it at $1.3 B. The initial Goddard robotic design was completed in November 2004. An independent look that same month by National Academy of Sciences concluded the robotic mission too complex and recommended a Shuttle repair mission for Hubble. But O’Keefe said the Shuttle mission was too risky, and the robotic repair was too expensive, so he canceled the mission again. Two months later, O’Keefe resigned as NASA Administrator and left the Agency. When Mike Griffin, NASA’s new Administrator took over, he ordered a second look, and bolstered with new ways to ensure Shuttle safety, the repair mission was back on.
On this mission – – repair mission four (note, this is called repair 4 because NASA counts the other missions in an odd way: 1, 2, 3A, 3B) — the schedule is crowded with EVAs or extra-vehicular activities. Six gyroscopes used to maintain the telescope’s orientation will be replaced, two scientific instruments will be installed along with new batteries, guidance sensors, and blankets, and –for the first time ever – two instruments will be repaired. How ironic that this mission will also remove the corrective “eyeglasses” put in place on the very first Hubble repair mission. All the new instruments themselves now contain corrective optics that will compensate for the spherical aberration in Hubble’s primary mirror.
Shuttle Atlantis will carry a seven member crew into orbit on the nominal 11-day mission. The commander is a Hubble veteran. The pilot and flight engineer will be making their first flights. Astronauts Scott Altman, Gregory C. Johnson and Megan McArthur will handle the tasks inside the Shuttle. Megan will “man” the Shuttle’s robotic arm, grappling Hubble and placing it in the Shuttle’s cargo bay, where it will wait for four astronauts to give it the overhaul of its long life.
The four astronauts on tap to perform the space-walking feats are John Grunsfeld, Andrew Feustel, Michael Good, and Mike Massimino. Over the years, close collaboration between engineers and astronauts has resulted in significant advances. For instance, in the case of one of the science instruments to be repaired (the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph or STIS), cleverly designed tools will allow the astronauts to remove one hundred and eleven screws from a cover over the instrument. Now, this might be tedious on the ground, but at least it’s not dangerous. In the weightless environment of space, floating screws could be a menace. Engineering tricks are called for so that all the pieces are captured, and after the instrument is repaired, a new cover will be installed that easily latches, even with large astronaut gloves. The pictures below show how busy the largest clean room in the free world can be.
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 1. The large silver tube lined with yellow on your right is a mock-up of the Hubble instrument bay. | Figure 2. A good look at some of the bunny suits used in the largest clean room in the world – 1.3 million cubic feet of pristine, contaminant-free working space. |
The hardware will be shipped to the Cape in thirteen days, so there’s no time to lose. Today, the four EVA astronauts are in the clean room familiarizing themselves with the new tools designed for this mission. The clean room you see here has the maximum allowable number of human beings in it. We humans are the source of much of the potential contamination to space hardware. The ‘bunny suits’ you see here cover as much of the human and her/his clothes as possible. As the Integration and Test Manager, Joe Reed, said today, the safety of humans in the clean room is first priority. Then comes the safety and cleanliness of the hardware. In the left image below,the large silver tube lined with yellow on your right is a mock-up of the Hubble instrument bay. The image on the right shows a good look at some of the bunny suits used in the largest clean room in the world—1.3 million cubic feet of pristine, contaminate-free working space.
For myself, helping to plan the Great Observatories (Hubble, Chandra, and Spitzer) early in my career emboldened me to return to school for a PhD in physics. Of course, there was no way I would forgo my day-job working for NASA in astrophysics. Today, I’m teaching at the Elliott School at George Washington University and enjoying writing about space and Earth science and how they intersect with politics.
So I’m hoping that my years of tenure at NASA will help me to serve as your tour guide to activities leading up to the ultimate Hubble repair mission. I’ll introduce you to the individuals who are working on Hubble and on this mission. These folks live in almost every state of the union. They do more than spend their working life on Hubble, but during the coming weeks leading up to the flight on the 8th of October, their personal lives will be placed on hold while they ensure another 5 years of science from the world’s premier telescope. I hope you’ll join me on this journey to the stars.
Oh, and the consequences of that little visit from the FBI? You’ll have to check future blogs to find that out!
Til then,
Colleen
Welcome to the blogs, Colleen.
There is a backstory to your story, one that you are unaware of.
In early 2004, I wrote a missive to Keith Cowing’s NASAWatch that basically said that instead of appearing to have thrown in the towel as regards the HST-SM4, Sean O’Keefe should have issued a challenge to NASA to comply with the CAIB’s recommendations, and to get it done within the original time span. It set in motion a chain of events that still continues even today.
Uninformed people, those who have never read the CAIB’s final report, are prone to lay blame for the cancellation(s) at Sean’s feet, when in reality, he was following the CAIB’s direction.
The NASA family rose to the challenge, once again embracing the spirit that made “failure is not an option” part of the lexicon, and although it took them a few years to get it right, made sufficient progress with the ability to perform on-orbit TPS repair procedures to satisfy the recommendations.
The public would roast Griffin on a spit if he arbitrarily dismissed the CAIB recommendations…he, like Sean, walks past a portrait of the STS-107 crew before opening those glass doors on the ninth floor every morning.
I’ve been there…that’s part of the story.
I can’t think of a better crew for this mission. Both Grunsfeld and Massimino can take HST apart and put it back together again in their sleep! A field service engineer myself, a little bit of myself goes along with them on this “service call”. In field service, it’s whatever, whenever, wherever.
Anyone can fix it in the shop…we do it on site!
As much as I hate to wish the short summer away, I’m finding that I’m becoming emotional over STS-125, thinking about rearranging my vacation time so I can glue myself to my HDTV and watch the work in real time.
So, go 125, and don’t forget to put anti-seize where it needs to be for the next time…there wasn’t supposed to be a next time last time, but here we are.
First, Let me congratulate you on such an inspiring and professional article. (Blog?) I don’t think so.
It will be a pleasure to continue this Journey, with great antisipation, I will be looking forward to having your insight on things to come.
What a wonderful refreshment you bring with your down to earth attitude.
P.S. I am looking forward to the FBI sequel.
Sincerely RollingThundar.
Colleen
I never new your were a program analyst…..you go girl.
Great Blog and Scientist
Hello Colleen,
I represent 3 Defense Department employees, working on a group project for a graduate course in Systems Integration as part of a Master of Science in Systems Engineering.
Our assignment is to analyze a well-known system, in terms of how system integration during the design phase, contributed to the system’s overall success or failure. We chose the Hubble Space Telescope because its modular design allows astronauts to fix, maintain, or upgrade the system while in space. As you, of course, know, the Hubble’s innovative design is what allowed NASA to correct, in space, the mirror error that was not caught by testing while the system was still on the ground.
We would like to know if it is possible for us to meet with someone, such as yourself, who would be familiar with the Hubble’s design. Our assignment is due in early September so the visit would need to take place within the next few weeks. As busy working folks ourselves, we understand this would be a big favor, yet we feel it would be very beneficial to hear insights from the people who really know the Hubble.
Please let me know if such a visit can be arranged, and who I should contact to set it up.
Sincerely,
Kelly M.
Thanks for doing what you do,
Colleen: Thank you very much for a very informative presentation of the Hubble drama.
With the limited information available to the general public, we have very little appreciation for the enormous contribution of Hubble to the scientific community. The decision for repair mission 4 is an excellent one so that there will be no disruption of the important discoveries that have yet to be revealed until the next generation space telescope replaces it.
Your information about the complexities of robotic repairs on a unit not designed for robotic repairs from the get-go, leads one to question the decision to spend large amounts of scarce funds to explore the robotic option. I salute the powers to be for deciding to go ahead with repair mission 4.
I am looking forward to your future updates and for information on the successful completion of the mission.
Thank you
Mordecai Albert